Anti Knife Crime by Mark Davies

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Blog
Anti Knife Crime Blog

Logic in the Scottish Government????????????

E-mail Print PDF

I was driving home from taking my kids classes in Montrose & was listening to the radio. I really should avoid listening to the news as I usually hear something that winds me up & gets me all bitter & twisted, & tonight was no exception.

It seems that the SNP have decided that to stop overcrowding in prisons, people who would receive custodial sentences of under 6 months should receive an 'alternative' instead, with more use being made of community service etc. As soon as I heard this I had to fight the urge to bite my steering wheel in half!

I keep saying that a major problem in government, & in the civil service folks who advise ministers; is that many of them just don't understand the problems they're trying to tackle. They don't understand the mindset of the people they're trying to deal with. We get loads of stupid initiatives to deal with knife crime because they don't really understand the people involved & how they think, & they don't really understand the knife itself. This carries over into this latest idiocy, as they don't really understand the sort of person that they are dealing with here. They may see lots of statistics (& we all know how reliable they are don't we!) but they don't really 'get' the actual reality of things at ground level. They simply can't get inside the head of the little chav gang member, its so far outside of their nice middle class university educated life that they'd have as much chance of understanding a visitor from Proxima Centauri!

I worked doors for 19 years on & off. I spent a great deal of time mixing with the criminal underbelly of Scottish society. Here is the truth folks, the hard core troublemakers are going to be laughing at you. They already laugh at the criminal justice system. They already think of politicians as a bunch of airheads. Trust me, the gang members that got invited into the parliament just think that:

1/ They must be really dangerous & tough if they are so important as to get invited there.

2/ The people who invited them are 'saft in the heed bampots'.

The repeat offenders who are in court on a weekly basis, & who generally face these short sentences laugh their heads off at the punishments they get. When they get a fine they don't care- they get to pay it off at £5 a month from their dole money. When the get community service they think its a laugh, & half the time don't turn up. When they get a short sentence they think its great as they generally have better food, no bills, & a better standard of living than they normally enjoy; all the while seeing their old friends. If anyone thinks that community based punishments REALLY stop re-offending then I have some Eastern Block Currency & a timeshare on Mars you might be interested in!

The majority of violent crime, housebreaking, shoplifting, car theft etc etc etc, is committed by a minority of habitual criminals. I agree that someone who has made a genuine mistake & has no prior criminal record could benefit from not getting banged up in prison. But ladies & germs, some of the people I see Sheriff Stein letting off with a slap on the wrist every week in the local paper are HABITUAL CRIMINALS who are not going to get rehabilitated & just cause people constant misery in the community.

Until the SNP realise that they can't be warm & fuzzy & progressive anymore with law & order. We need some tough justice. We need the habitual offenders out there -  the people who ENJOY hurting people & ruining everything they touch - identified as being HABITUAL CRIMINALS WHO ARE NOT GOING TO BE REHABILITATED, & DEALT WITH STRONGLY SO THAT THE DECENT FOLKS IN SOCIETY DON'T HAVE TO SUFFER BECAUSE OF THEM, & BECAUSE OF STUPID PEOPLE WHO'S WISHFUL THINKING GETS THE BETTER OF THEIR GRASP ON REALITY! I'm sorry if I'm sounding a bit strong here, but I'm tired beating around the bush trying to be polite. The sooner we realise that the best way to lower the levels of crime in society is to remove the repeat offenders from having the liberty to commit those crimes & sow misery wherever they go, the sooner we will see a less violent & crime ridden country. Oh, & by the way- stop worrying unceasingly about the human rights of these poor little housebreakers & muggers. Prison isn't meant to be a nice place to be, & the next time you hear an ex-con whining about how nasty it was inside, remind them that THEY PUT THEMSELVES THERE BY BEING A CRIMINAL! I did a seminar for a group down near London earlier this year. One of the guys on the course was a prison officer & he commented to me "If the victims of crime & their families saw just how cushy prisoners have it inside there would be a huge outcry". I was gobsmacked when he told me they had a room in his prison which was full of brand new TV's- because if an inmate smashed a TV they had to replace it straight away because of their 'human rights'. Does anyone else see the lunacy in this, hello McFly????????????????

Now hear this..... Now hear this..... BUILD MORE PRISONS & USE THEM TO KEEP THE PEOPLE WHO RUIN SOCIETY WHERE THEY DESERVE TO BE! The people I knew who carried weapons with the aim & intent to use them were ALL known to the police. They were ALL constant re-offenders. If the justice system had intervened & put them inside for a considerable time then many people wouldn't have had misery introduced into their lives by them. I've said before that several US states have '3 strikes then you're out' laws. If you commit 3 felonies then its a mandatory life sentence in a Federal Penetetiary, this is where the phrase '3 time loser' comes from. Now remember, these folks don't bother about deterrents- what the 3 strikes law does is take these people out of circulation for 15 years or so, saving alot of people who would have otherwise become their victims. If we want to see a real drop in violent crime, knife crime, drug related crime, theft & housebreaking- this type of law would work wonders if applied with a will.

 

Where do they get these ideas????????

E-mail Print PDF

In general I welcome most initiatives that are brought forward to attempt to reduce violent crime, but sometimes I have to admit that the government come up with ideas that just make my jaw hit the floor. The problem as I see it is that there are a lot of well meaning civil servants working in places like parliament who come up with ideas, but they just don't really understand the mindset of the sorts of people they are trying to get through to. From my experience most of them are nice middle class people who have never really spent more than a few minutes with the folks that make up the dark underbelly of society. They are so out of their depth when it comes to thinking of ways to reach them they might as well be dealing with creatures from Proxima Centauri!

So now some bright spark as come up with the idea to get maxilliofacial (don't know if I spelled that quite right but I'm sure you'll get my drift) surgeons in to speak to youths about knife wounds. Now just for one minute imagine a nice super smart surgeon walking into a room full of chavs & getting bombarded with the sort of smart arsed comments that young chav types come out with. The poor bloke will probably need therapy afterwards. Also, please remember it was a Maxilliofacial surgeon who came up with the bright idea of having knives with no point so folks can't get stabbed. Guess he's never seen anyone stabbed with a screwdriver, chisel, awl, home made shank, pen, pencil, pointed stick etc! I'm just waiting to see who comes up with the idea for 'The Kitchen Police' to enforce a new 'Non pointy knives' law.

So Mr Civil Servant, here's my tuppence worth! A surgeon may be able to tell the kids in great detail the effects of a knife wound on the human body, but can they explain to them in vivid detail the terrible scene surrounding a knife attack? Can they get over to them the smell of the blood & other body fluids? Can they get over to them the feelings of rage/panic/terror? Can they explain to them the 'concequencial fallout' that everyone involved with the attacker & victim ends up affected by? Have they ever 'been there - done that'? Do they understand the mindset of the kids they are speaking to? Will the youths relate to them & respect them? The study by the Centres for Crime & Justice Studies pointed out that education programmes were the most effective method of reducing weapons carrying on a local basis, BUT that to be effective they had to be delivered by someone that the youths could identify with- NOT AN AUTHORITY FIGURE. Getting the police, teachers etc, to deliver the programme was a waste of time! Sorry Mr Civil Servant, but your surgeon is going to end up being a total waste of time too.

There ARE some folks in politics who 'get it' & have a realistic idea of what will work & what won't; & who are honest enough to listen to people like me who have experience that these Civil Servants don't- even though I may have ideas that are at odds with the 'accepted doctrine' most politicians believe (once again- intellectual honesty!). Alex Johnstone MSP is one- he has campaigned for the past couple of years for more effective approaches to combating violent crime & knife crime amongst our young people. Alex is rare amongst politicians in that he has experienced knife crime at first hand, & helped to apprehend a knife carrying criminal. My friend, Councillor Jim Millar, is another person who has his head firmly screwed on- as far as I'm concerned he has done more & put in more effort to effectively combat under-age drinking & anti social behaviour since he got in than some of the 'usual suspects' who have been on the local political scene for many years before him. These are the sorts of people we need to see being more involved in the strategic planning side of things within government!

How long are we going to see new initiatives that are long on 'smart' & short on 'reality'? 

 

GMTV, woohoooooo

E-mail Print PDF

 

Today was a good day. I just got back from London where I was featured on GMTV.

I was phoned on Friday by GMTV to ask if I was willing to appear on their show as they were doing a piece on knife crime & the governments new initiative to perform 'sting operations' sending 'trained youths' into shops to see if they would sell them knives. Well, they flew me down on Sunday. Unfortunately the trip didn't go as planned, as Heathrow Airport got closed down due to a fire alarm going off in the air traffic control centre. We got diverted to Luton where we spent a couple of hours on the tarmac, deep joy! Never mind, the hotel was lovely (got in at 11pm) & after 4 hours sleep I was whisked off to GMTV studio's to 'do my thang'.

So what do I think of the latest government initiative? I have heard that various youth workers have criticised it, & said it won't have any effect on knife carrying as most kids just take them out of the kitchen drawer, & they are right- to a point. I personally do think that its worth doing though. The folks I know in trading standards are hard working people who do great work, & if they feel that certain shops have been illegally selling knives to children then its worth doing something about it. Cutting down on violent crime is going to take many different scheme's & initiatives. If sending some youths into shops as a sting to see if they are sold knives stops these shops from selling even one little chav a knife that would otherwise end up killing another innocent victim it is worth it! However, only if it is- as the government minister also on the programme said- part of a wider range of measures. The trouble is that Governments have a horrible habit of coming out with a wide range of useless measures which are more about looking good in the press than actually doing anything. Part of the trouble is that the people who come up with these measures don't really understand the problems. As Councillor Jim Millar has said in his excellent Blog, when actually questioned about what initiatives are in place it actually turns out that nobody actually has a clue; as there aren't any. My concern is that we're going to see the usual bunch of knife amnesty's, weapons bans, additional & un-needed legislation etc. I suggest anyone interested in the reality of the subject should check out http://www.jimmillar.blogspot.com/ & his entry 'Pointless Legislation II'. I'm not a politician, & I don't have any particular political leanings; I'm purely concerned with trying to make a difference in my own little way. I'm happy to work with any organisation that really wants to make a difference, & believe it or not I do try to not be too damning of the current government. Jim does make some excellent points in his blog though, & they are the truth. Both the SNP & Labour need to address reality & forget quick fixes & PR stunt legislation. If I don't think it'll work I'll say so regardless of the political party or organisation involved. That isn't to say I'm not happy to help them improve their schemes.

One thing I keep going on about is 'Perception V's Reality'. You'll hear me speaking about this quite often, as it is easy for you to let Perception overcome Reality when you don't really understand the reality that you're speaking about. If the government is serious about doing something about violent crime (not just knife crime) it is going to take more than just some initiatives that let them say "look we're doing something". The one thing that ministers just STILL don't seem to get is that the average Joe in the street can see right through their PR initiatives that accomplish nothing. The odd good idea does come out- for instance getting people who have done prison time for using weapons to speak to kids found carrying knives is a great idea. These 'Scared Straight' type programmes definitely help, as it gets through to the decent kids who are carrying through fear. The little chavs who won't listen to anything need to be harshly dealt with by law enforcement & the legal system! The problem is that the government needs to stop trying to simply deal with the fear of armed crime, & deal with the problem itself. An example I've made a few times is to do with this pointless exercise in licensing shops that sell the dreaded 'non-domestic knife'. So here is an example of a really scary 'non domestic knife'.
Scary knife
Looks absolutely deadly doesn't it.....frightening looking? Yes it is! But believe it or not as a weapon it is absolutely useless. I bought one to use as a demonstration piece. It is FAR less effective as a weapon than this domestic knife. I'm a qualified instructor of several knife systems & I have an intimate understanding of exactly how effective different blade shapes & designs will perform as weapons!
Kitchen knife
The scary & deadly looking knife is so blunt it wouldn't cut through clothing. In fact it won't even cut my bare flesh! The domestic knife is designed to cut meat & will cut through clothing, skin & muscle. What’s more it'll cause a deep penetrating wound when used in the thrust (cuts, though they cause terrible wounds, rarely kill; it's the thrust that kills). The big difference is that a youth would have to buy the scary looking non domestic knife, where-as the kitchen knife is gotten free of charge from their parents’ kitchen! People tend to go for the 'freebie' when they intend to throw the weapon away after use more often than not. Now, don't get me wrong- I don't think that kids should be free to buy knives like that; but licensing shops that sell 'non domestic knives' is just like putting a chocolate ashtray on a motorcycle you intend to ride through hell! Let me put it into perspective, here in Arbroath we have an excellently & responsibly run shop that deals in hunting & fishing gear. If this legislation goes through they will have to get a licence to sell the small number of 'non domestic knives' they stock (which are entirely comprised of the type of knives needed by people going fishing or hunting). Now right next door is a shop that sells all sorts of stuff at knockdown prices, & has a huge range of kitchen knives that would cut you to the bone with no effort at all. Will they need licensed? No! Which shop is selling the more dangerous knives at the cheaper price, & which shop is selling the cheaper knives that are the main type of knife used in violent crimes? Get my drift?

What many people find surprising is that personally I find shops with windows full of cheap & nasty fantasy knives & hunting knives distasteful. I don't personally like shops having knives like the one pictured above in the shop window, as it does sensationalise them to some degree & as an instructor of several blade arts I hate cheap & nasty lumps of steel like that. The thing is, as tacky as I find these shops their existence has little to do with knife crime.   

So, why don't we stop trying to do the pointless & move onto doing things that might actually make a difference? Making a difference will be more difficult & longer term. The things that need to be done may well take some flak from certain pressure groups. As I tell my martial arts students though, the only things worth having are those that are the most difficult to achieve, & sometimes the loudest voices aren't the ones to listen to.

Big thanks to all the staff at GMTV for a great experience, anytime you need me folks you know where I am.

Mark
 
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:51 )
 

Hypocrite????????????

E-mail Print PDF
Who am I?

What am I?


Two very important questions I'm going to answer here. I am primarily a Martial Arts instructor. It’s what I have done for the majority of my life almost full time. When I was in my early teens I knew this was what I wanted to do. I threw myself into training with all my heart, training five or six nights a week- & also everyday in my jury-rigged gym in the family garage. I have sacrificed a great deal to get where I am, when other young people were doing what they normally do at that age, I was devoted to self development & discovery through hard training. A great deal of whom I am today, the discipline I have, the self control I have, the sense of justice I have; all have been forged over the anvil of martial arts training.

Most people have an image of the martial arts as being a bunch of people wearing pyjamas doing kicks & punches. The truth is though that the martial arts are a very large world. Many martial arts are based on weapons training. Okinawan Kobudo practitioners train with the Tonfa (side handle batons), Sai (forked dagger type tool), Nunchaku (rice flails), Bo (staff), Eku (oar- yes I said an oar) & many other weapons. Chinese Kung Fu has probably the widest range of weapons practiced, with many types of sword, dagger, staff, spear, daggers, knives & throwing weapons- so many I'm not even going to start listing them. Some practitioners of Japanese JuJutsu, Aikido/Aikijujutsu, Karate-do; & all practitioners of Kenjutsu, Iaijutsu & Batto jutsu practice with the Japanese sword- the (dreaded) 'Samurai sword', the Katana. Since around 1986 I have trained in weapons arts. I started with Japanese & Korean weapons arts, & then moved into a long time love affair with the South East Asian martial arts. I continue to study (& teach) these arts. I have studied with some of the top experts & masters in the world. Pekiti Tirsia, Kali, Escrima, Arnis de mano, Silat- these are the wonderful, ancient, beautiful, warrior arts I continue to study & teach. What is one thing that all these arts specialise in?

The Knife! (Everyone draws breath as if Satan himself walked in the room).........

So am I (as I have been accused of being) a hypocrite? Do I in one breath tell kids not to carry knives but in the other teach the use of them- in three words YES I DO! Does this make me a hypocrite, no I don't think so. I'm a professional martial arts instructor who teaches martial arts that involve the use of weapons (primarily the stick & the knife) to qualified licensed martial adult martial arts students & the Military. Does this mean that I automatically think that kids should carry knives for self defence- if you think so then I think you should do a course on logic & return to reality! Do instructors of Japanese Kenjutsu which uses the samurai sword (Katana) think that everyone should be allowed to carry a Katana? Last I checked the answer was NO! Do instructors of medieval western sword fencing & renaissance martial arts think we should all be carrying a Rapier & Main Gauche because they train & teach with them? Once again, last I checked the answer was NO! Do instructors of Chinese Wu Shu think that we should all be carrying a Broadsword or rope dart? No! Do instructors of Archery think we should all be carrying longbows, again methinks- NO! The thing I'm trying to get over is that just because we teach something that is historically a warrior art it doesn't follow that we wish kids to be practising it on the street. Trust me, I have seen 11 & 12 year old kids in street gangs battling with cheap swords & machete’s- it’s not anything I want to see again in my lifetime.

I am a very strong advocate of the right of the person to defend themselves in a manner which allows them a realistic chance of success. It seems strange to me that some people seem to almost expect people to roll over & just let people mug them. To fight fairly & all that rubbish. To successfully defend yourself against a streetwise opponent even if they're unarmed is difficult for most people, even trained blackbelts.  Does it mean I want every Tom Dick or Harry carrying weapons? No. As a self defence instructor I do advocate certain LEGAL self defence tools that have been deemed by the law not to be offensive weapons (such as the Kubotan keyring or walking cane)  that can give the average person a slight advantage if attacked. Let’s face it, it’s difficult to imagine someone going out performing a vicious spree of violent acts with a 4 inch piece of plastic rod! I stock & sell Kubotans & similar in my gym, only to over 18 year old students or their family members. I know that I'm supposed to be a hard hearted steely eyed warrior who teaches people to cut the hearts from their opponents & turn them into an object d'art before their eyes- but I recently performed a free series of self defence workshops for a local organisation that looks after abused women. These women have been through hell, & are in safe housing. Some have been raped, others viciously attacked by people they thought they could trust. It was amazing the way a bit of basic self defence training & a short piece of plastic rod on a keyring could help them recover their confidence & self esteem! A heinous offensive weapon? if you think so after seeing who benefitted from it then I feel genuinely sorry for you, but like I say I haven't seen too many chavs attacking someone with a blunt 4" lightweight plastic rod! It is a force multiplier for those weaker than the thugs & muggers out there. My martial arts website is frequented by military operators from around the world (I have provided instruction for Special Forces & elite units from around the globe) who are currently going into harm’s way. On my website I have in the past featured some specialised weapons & bits of kit of interest to my friends & students in the military. These would be of no use to any civilian without the required specialised training. My martial arts & combatives instruction is separate to my anti knife crime efforts, & there isn't even a link from one site to the other. However, if you happen upon it you'll see the same thing on it constantly "we do not condone the carrying of illegal weapons or of committing illegal acts, we are in the business of teaching people how to survive such things". If I was in the business of indiscriminately selling weapons to just anyone I wouldn't have police officers coming to me for private training (which I do for free).

The martial arts. People often forget that the first word there (Martial) essentially means 'War'. Some parts of the martial arts are ugly & terrible things to behold. There are many techniques & methods I know that I would never dream of using on an opponent in real life. Just as the instructor of medieval & renaissance fighting arts knows & demonstrates many battlefield techniques that he would never dream of performing even in self defence, the Oriental martial arts have many techniques which are a gateway to a time in history even more violent than today. Here lies a paradox within the martial arts; knowing how terrible these original battlefield techniques are (such as a systematic attack of the opponents muscles & a finishing attack to their un-armoured nether regions- as found in Pekiti Tirsia) makes you realise more just how much you don't want kids carrying weapons. A youth lashing out with a knife can cause wounds that most people can't even visualise. Martial arts & knife techniques are available all over the internet. DVD's on it can be bought on ebay or from martial arts suppliers. The thing is, some chav could watch these DVD's & see all these techniques for the rest of the year; but without the timing, control, appreciation of distancing, co-ordination & actual physical technique gained from actual training under a good teacher- IT WON'T DO THEM ONE BIT OF GOOD. Why do you think it takes years to become proficient in martial skills? The thing is, knowledge is universal. It can't be contained or controlled, it just is! That is why I cringe when I hear about martial artists who claim to be self taught from book or video tape. The only people who can gain anything from 'virtual lessons' are trained martial artists who already have the basis of good body mechanics, timing, rhythm etc. If this wasn't so the every chav who watched a Jet Li movie would be a sword & kung fu master!

So if we don't plan on using the knife as a weapon here in the UK why do we practice them? Well... like the Kendo practitioner who practices sword fighting with his bamboo shinai, or the Kenjutsu student practising sword kata with his Katana, or the Batto Jutsu student who practises cutting rolled tatami mats with his Katana, or the fencing student who studies Talhoffer or the other medieval manuscripts of medieval western martial arts; we practice them for a number of reasons- none of which relate to a wish to use the weapon on another person. Firstly is the fact that its fascinating, it’s a deep study of the human mind & its inventiveness. Its a chess game on a large scale. Secondly comes something that the lay-person won't have heard of or even think about- ATTRIBUTE TRAINING. When we do blade training in the SE Asian Arts we don't just learn to hack & stab at each other with sticks or training knives! The foundations of the training are the various two man drills that build timing, distancing, co-ordination, sensitivity, control & much more. This training really turbo-charges your 'normal' unarmed martial arts training like no other type of training. Third, the truth is that if you even want to stand a tiny chance of defending against a weapon then you need to understand how that weapon can be used, & have a deep understanding of the 'universal lines' it will travel down & the 'tricks of the trade' that can be employed by someone who wishes to do you harm. Anyone who says that you can be proficient at knife defence without 'knowing' the knife doesn't have a clue what they are talking about! I am the only instructor in Europe of the Euro-American Bowie system. This is a HISTORICAL system that trains in the American Bowie knife or Arkansas Toothpick. It is of the same ilk as the medieval dagger or longsword classes available out there. It is based upon Sabre fencing, as Jim Bowie's father practiced the Sabre. Is it some deadly system that will have people fighting in the streets with Bowie knives? No more than Kenjutsu is a deadly sword art that will encourage people to duel with Katana to solve their problems. We talk of "the deadly back-cut". Yes, it was deadly back in 1890! It is a name that everyone gives it, the same way as some Ninjutsu practitioners speak of "the deadly Kyokotsu Kudaki technique". Kyokotsu Kudaki- in English it sounds terrible; it means "crushing the sternum". It was a deadly technique, back in the 15th century. Unfortunately the ill informed or purposely malicious can make anything sound terrible if they try hard enough! If you really think that I'm encouraging people to carry 12 - 14" Bowie knives you'd better go & accuse the fencing instructor of encouraging people to arm themselves with Rapiers. Apart from them being a little big, heavy & practically impossible to conceal, Bowie knives are far more expensive than a knife nicked from mums kitchen.

The long & the short of it is that I am unapologetically proud to have the knowledge of martial arts that I possess & to teach the things I teach. The reasons that I can so effectively explain to young people the realities of knife carrying & what happens when a knife is used are;
1-  Because I am a qualified instructor of martial arts that practice knife training! I have a deeper understanding of the realities of what different knives can do, & of the realities of the knife than anyone who hasn't my level of training & knowledge of the knife. When I say to kids that I'm a qualified instructor of knife arts & an instructor to Special Forces they shut up & listen with a bit of respect! They know I know what I'm talking about & I'm not just another adult there to 'talk at them'.
2- Because I worked for 19 years in an environment where I got to watch exactly how violence happened. Where I got to mix with  & deal with the sociopaths & wolves of society. Where knife threats were often a nightly occurrence & where I had to deal with the aftermaths of violent attacks with weapons.
I'm not shy of telling politicians that I am a qualified instructor of blade arts. When I gave my presentation at the Parliament two years ago I told the assembled MSP's & staff that I was a qualified instructor of several knife systems. It’s old news there. The fact of the matter is that what I am makes me more effective in convincing young people that I know what I'm talking about. You might not like what I know! You might not be comfortable with what I know! But if I can make a difference to some kids lives, & maybe just save a few then maybe you should just let that slide. There is an old Romanian saying, "it is permissible to walk with the devil until you have crossed the bridge". However, just because I can teach these arts doesn't give me horns & a forked tail guys. I don't teach these martial arts skills to just anyone. The people who train are good decent people, if they weren't they wouldn't be in my classes. The people on my seminars tend to be very senior martial artists; at the lowest they are generally senior coloured belts with three or four years training under their instructor, & often they are experienced blackbelts or even masters. All are licensed martial artists, not just anyone off the street; they are not a risk to society! I'd be more worried about the unarmed skills I teach, as some of these are extremely deadly, & the person is always armed with their own hands & feet (joke).

I suppose the greatest endorsements I have are all the parents who bring their children specifically to me for my classes. If I was some raving lunatic teaching blood & guts all the time would I have so many Little Ninjas classes? Would I have teachers & social workers recommending my classes to parents of children with behavioural challenges? I have positively influenced the lives of thousands of children through the years I have been teaching, & I'm proud of it.

A final request put up or shut up. Before you criticise anyone who is actively giving their time to try to make a small difference & make youths think before they tool themselves up, or even before you criticise someone like Ken MacAskill, who might not be doing quite the right thing with his latest legislation- but who genuinely cares about what he's trying to achieve; ASK YOURSELF WHAT YOU ARE DOING TO STOP THE PROBLEM OF VIOLENT CRIME AMONGST YOUNG PEOPLE. If the answer is 'not a lot' then I suggest you keep your opinions to yourself. Remember opinions are like bums, everyone has one & not everyone wants to see yours!

Mark Davies
Last Updated ( Friday, 08 August 2008 12:57 )
 

The latest Anti Knife Crime Legislation- the reaction of Mark Davies

E-mail Print PDF

I was asked by the BBC to do an interview for Reporting Scotland today to comment on the government’s latest legislation against knife crime. Unfortunately after doing what I thought was a really good interview they didn't use that much of it, the news piece was very short- cest la vie. The great thing about having this blog is that I can say fully what I think.

The first thing I said in the interview is something I want to say again now. I don't want to criticise Mr MacAskill too heavily. I truly believe that (unlike many politicians) Mr MacAskill is genuinely deeply concerned about knife crime, violent crime, under age drinking etc. I genuinely believe that he really wants to do something about these problems; I just don't think that this is the right 'something'.

The thing that people forget is that a lot of man hours & money goes into initiatives & consultation processes like this, where it could go into more productive countermeasures. The problem seems to me that the people who are coming up with these ideas don't have someone telling them what it’s like 'at the coal face', & really educating them on the reality of what they face. The idea that licensing suppliers of 'non domestic knives' is going to do ANYTHING to reduce the incidence of knife crime if pure fantasy. The vast majority of chavs & crims carry domestic knives or sharp tools. They are cheap, readily available in quantity in any kitchen or tool kit, & easier to try to explain away than a 12" Rambo knife. I have to respectfully disagree with what Chief Inspector Carnachan (sorry if I've mis-spelled his name) said when I did a radio interview alongside him a year or so back. He was adamant that the problem lay in 'lock knives' (folding knives that lock open)- in the 19 years I worked on the doors & around the sort of people who carry knives & commit crimes very few of them carried those sorts of knives, a few did- but most didn't.  Once or twice I came across folks carrying nasty old hunting knives or fishing knives, but 90% of the time it was some form of domestic knife or tool. This is backed up by what I am told by front line police officers that I train, & people that I train who work in security all over the country. I'll finish this paragraph with an anecdote from a friend who manages a large supermarket in Dundee. One of their most shoplifted items were kitchen knives! The 'chavs & neds' would take them out of the packet & leave the packet on the shelf or hanging on the display, & make off out of the store with the knife.

There are a number of reasons for the use of domestic knives or tools. The 'repeat offender' type who shoplifts, does drugs, breaks into cars etc- will most often dispose of the weapon after it has been used; so they want a cheap (preferably free) weapon. They often believe that if they have some form of domestic knife or tool they may be able to explain it away more easily than a 'non domestic knife'. Many of the troublemakers who carry knives don't carry them all the time, they arm themselves if they are going to certain places or doing certain things. Often they snatch up a knife if they have had some sort of disagreement with someone. They tend to snatch up something readily available- a kitchen knife for example. So by making it harder to buy 'non domestic knives' we haven't inconvenienced these people a jot.

One thing that the people creating laws need educating about is the perception vs reality of 'non domestic knives'. Let’s face it, many of these knives look really dangerous & scary to most people. The reality is that most of them are less dangerous than a kitchen knife or butchers style knife. I took a very scary looking (£15) non domestic knife & sawed it back & forth across my arm for the camera today. Many of these hunting or fighting knives have terrible blades, with awful edge geometry & bad grinds. As a Master Instructor of edged weapons I can tell you that they would be hard pushed to get through a couple of layers of clothing. They look scarier, but in reality they are no more dangerous than your steak knife, & in actuality your steak knife or your carving knife makes a far more effective weapon. Remember, something like the 'laser' kitchen knives are designed to cut meat. They are designed to rend flesh, & they cut or penetrate with ease. They are far more effective than ANY of the cheap hunting or fighting knives you'll get in your average 'Victor Morris' type shop. I own many very expensive high end handmade knives; some are worth £1000's. To your average chav they offer no advantage over a butcher’s style knife from your kitchen. The reason soldiers or experienced hunters carry good & fairly expensive 'non domestic knives' is because they are robust & take abuse in the field. However for a chav who wants to use the knife once or twice & then throw it away, a steak knife from someone's kitchen will do the same damage as a £500 Strider fighting knife; & a damn site more than a cheap 'survival knife'. One of the nastiest 'street weapons' is the humble screwdriver. Remember, cuts don't generally kill; its penetrating wounds- stabs- that kill. In WW2 the SOE issued its operatives a killing knife that looked very much like a large Phillips head screwdriver. It issued this because when a knife is withdrawn from the body the wound closes up again, where-as with this style of blade it punched a hole into the target; pushing clothing fibres & all the microbial flora & fauna that lives in it into the wound. This guaranteed a terrible secondary infection. A modern screwdriver does the same thing. It creates a terrible wound that doesn't close up. It doesn't look scary like a fighting, hunting or fantasy knife. It’s impossible to control or legislate against, but it’s a frightening weapon in the wrong hands.

So the next time you see some terrible looking 'Ninja Fang of Death' along with a scare story, remember its no more (& most likely far less) dangerous than the knives in your kitchen. In his interview at the Parliament Mr McAskill said that "this is about tackling the knife culture in Scotland. This won't eradicate the indiscriminate use of knives, that will take a variety of methods, but we do have to make sure that these knives are not readily available or acting as an inducement or enticement to people who may be encouraged to obtain them". I totally agree, it IS going to take a variety of methods to lower the incidence of violent crime & anti social behaviour in the UK. There is no single magic bullet that is going to do it. Unfortunately this latest idea will do little. The people who would have bought a 'Ninja Fang of Death' or 'Rambo's Toothpick of Doom' will simply pick up a stanley knife or a kitchen knife, or an awl, or a chisel, or a screwdriver, or make a shank out of a nail & a bit of wood, or tape a handle onto a hacksaw blade (all things I've faced or confiscated). The majority of the chavs & crims already do!

A knife is an inanimate object. The knife is not in itself evil or dangerous. It is a tool, & like any tool it depends upon the person wielding it. It is the mind that is dangerous. It is the mind of the criminals & the anti social that are dangerous. If we want to make a difference we need to work on the minds of the young to show them the correct path. We need to work on the minds of the youths to show the fearful amongst them that carrying a knife is going to potentially destroy their lives, not save them; & along the way we might just persuade a few of the chavs to take a look at themselves. We need to treat anti social behaviour & crime with the severity that it deserves & stop trying to be 'progressive' & warm & fuzzy with habitual offenders. There comes a point where the powers that be need to understand that some people aren't going to be rehabilitated & that the safety of society needs to come first. We have a family here in Arbroath who fall into this category. The entire family are constantly in the paper. Week in week out one of them has been charged or convicted of something. They do drugs, they break into houses, they break into cars, they break into sheds, and they attack people. Everyone I know is sick to death of seeing them constantly get sentences & fines that they are laughing at. These are the same types of folk who carry weapons without a seconds thought. No matter how 'illegal' it is or what the penalty is, they are habitual criminals- crime is what they do! Its people like them who commit the majority of violent crimes. If we want to see a drop in the rate of violent/knife crime we need to stop playing games with these people & GET THEM OFF THE STREETS!

These are far more difficult things to do than simply licensing shops that seel non domestic knives. But these are things that will work. I always tell my martial arts students that the only things worth attaining are those things that are most challenging!

Mark Davies

Last Updated ( Friday, 08 August 2008 13:05 )
 


Page 2 of 3